The first check before you spend $50k+ on a Quality of Earnings Report
Verning reveals the red flags before you commit to spending $50,000 on a full investigative Quality of Earnings report. Commission a Verning Quality of Earnings Lite with CPA review to screen your deal at a fraction of the cost.
Quality of Earnings Lite report preview
Reported EBITDA
1,842,400
Adjusted EBITDA
1,538,400
3
Red flags
11
Cleared
Red flags
· 3Cleared checks
· 3 shown⊤ Every flag links to source documents · Prepared by Verning · Reviewed by J. Whitfield, CPA
Who uses Verning for Quality of Earnings
We killed a bad deal in nine days instead of paying $45K for a QoE that would have told us the same thing. The workbook is the product — my lender opened it and didn't ask a single formatting question.
Traditional QoE charges for labor.
We charge for the work.
Most of a traditional engagement's cost is junior accountants manually reading, tying out, and reformatting financials — hour by hour. Verning collapses that layer entirely. You pay for the output, not the staffing pyramid behind it.
Cost of a typical engagement
Same rigor. Without the pyramid.
Thousands of pages. Zero manual tie-out.
Bank statements, P&Ls, tax returns — every line read and reconciled automatically. No oversight risk compounding across hundreds of pages. Nothing missed because someone was tired at hour six.
A licensed accountant owns every reconciliation.
Cheaper doesn't mean unsupervised. Every output is reviewed by an in-house CPA-accredited accountant before it reaches you — named, licensed, accountable. Automation handles scale. The accountant handles judgment.
† QoE Lite is scoped for transactions under $10M revenue. Full-scope available on request.
Get started →FAQ